January 14th, 2010  |  Posted by:  Jimmy  |  1 Article Comments/Leave a Comment
Categorized in: Running

Best Value in Running Shoes: The K-Swiss Tubesâ„¢ Run 100

The K-Swiss Tubesâ„¢ Run 100 Men's Running Shoes

In the past year I’ve run well over 2,000 miles in approximately 36 pairs of shoes, and the K-Swiss Tubesâ„¢ Run 100 has officially been awarded my very own, very unofficial designation as Best Value in running shoes.

The K-Swiss Tubesâ„¢ Run 100 is a neutral trainer for the biomechanically efficient runner who’s looking for great cushioning, plush responsiveness (READ: smooth heel-to-toe transition) and likes a good-looking shoe (it’s hard not to mention the flashy packaging). Another perk: These shoes are lightweight.

All the biomechanics mumbo-jumbo aside, this shoe is ideal for men and women who want great comfort and durability in a running shoe without having to take a second mortgage on the house. Most comparable shoes from other brands will cost you $110 to $135 or more. The K-Swiss Tubesâ„¢ Run 100 retail for only $75.

The K-Swiss Tubesâ„¢ Run 100 Women's Running Shoes

The best feature of the K-Swiss Tubesâ„¢ Run 100–the tubes are not just for aesthetics. They’re actually an active part of the shoe and offer most of its cushioning and smooth ride.

The K-Swiss Tubesâ„¢ Run 100 may not hold up well with a heavier runner, but don’t fret because K-Swiss has you covered, too. The K-Swiss Run One-miSoulâ„¢ Tech running shoe offers greater stability and some pretty substantial (READ: awesome) cushioning for larger-framed runners.

After three months of wear-testing, I’m proud to offer my first unofficial Best Value in running shoes award to the K-Swiss Tubesâ„¢ Run 100. Impressively well-cushioned, lightweight (they feel oh-so-fast) and responsive. I don’t know any other shoe close to its price tag that performs nearly as well.

By Jimmy A former collegiate track and cross-country runner who now enjoys training for and traveling to a marathon or two every year, Jimmy’s an OnlineShoes.com employee, running gear guru, and a useless trivia savant.

1 Comment

  • What do you think would be a cut-off point for bigger-framed runners? I’m about 5’7″ and 175, so I’m definitely bigger, but I’m losing weight, too. Would you suggest the miSouls?

    —By Slightly Bigger on October 4, 2010 at 10:00 am

Leave a Comment








Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Find Out FIRST
New Arrivals, Brands, & Special Offers
Shop OnlineShoes.com